Read Keith v. County of Oakland, 2013 U.S.App. LEXIS 595 (6th Cir) Does it appear

Read Keith v. County of Oakland, 2013 U.S.App. LEXIS 595 (6th Cir) Does it appear

Read Keith v. County of Oakland, 2013 U.S.App. LEXIS 595 (6th Cir) Does it appear the type of individual inquiry required by the ADA

Read Keith v. County of Oakland, 2013 U.S.App. LEXIS 595 (6th Cir). Post your answers to questions 1 through 5 found at the end of the case. Do you agree with this decision?

 

1.       What are the legal issues in this case? What did the appeals court decide?

2.       Does it appear the type of individual inquiry required by the ADA occurred in this case? Why or why not?

3.       Was the plaintiff otherwise qualified for this lifeguard position? why or why not?

4.       What accommodations was the plaintiff requesting? Are they reasonable? why or why not? would they like impose an undue hardship? why or why not?

5.       What did the county do well in this case? What things could have done differently?
Read Keith v. County of Oakland, 2013 U.S.App. LEXIS 595 (6th Cir) Does it appear the type of individual inquiry required by the ADA

Read Keith v. County of Oakland, 2013 U.S.App. LEXIS 595 (6th Cir). Post your answers to questions 1 through 5 found at the end of the case. Do you agree with this decision?

 

1.       What are the legal issues in this case? What did the appeals court decide?

2.       Does it appear the type of individual inquiry required by the ADA occurred in this case? Why or why not?

3.       Was the plaintiff otherwise qualified for this lifeguard position? why or why not?

4.       What accommodations was the plaintiff requesting? Are they reasonable? why or why not? would they like impose an undue hardship? why or why not?

5.       What did the county do well in this case? What things could have done differently?
Powered by