Lab 2 (Graded) Understanding System Calls in Linux Solution

Lab 2 is graded and must be run on Linux using Ubuntu 16.04.X (the lab PCs are using 16.04.1). This is because di erent versions of Linux could possibly give di erent answers.




In the command line examples for Labs, the ‘$’ is used to indicate the shell prompt. Your actual prompt may di er (and can be changed). I will usually use teletype font for command lines, C code, system calls, functions and programs.




After this lab, you will appreciate better what actually happens when a process runs (with both static and dynamic linked executables). You will get to understand the connection between the C code and the system calls. You will also see how strace can be used to investigate a program and do some debugging.




Remark: You should treat every lab as having something to learn. In many labs, also something to \play with". By \playing", I mean that you can experiment with the programs or methodology in the lab. For example, in Ex1 you can modify the program and observe the result of strace, you are not restricted to just what is stated in the assignment. Obviously submission should be based on the lab itself.







Exercise 1: System Call Tracing (Graded)






Goals: Learn how to use strace to examine the system calls generated by a running process




On Linux, the strace utility can show you ALL the system calls made by a program. First, read the strace man page. Its long enough that you might not immediately understand the whole man page, however, it will make more sense once you have started using strace.




It will also be useful to read some other man pages. This is because given the interconnected nature of OS, some system calls may be from topics which we haven’t covered yet. As such, the man pages will give you an idea what is going on. Take note that the actual system calls used can vary due to di erences in versions of Linux and C libraries, for example exit() can vary between Unixes.




You will see also that since strace shows the low level system calls, the precise behavior may be somewhat di erent from what the higher level documentation says. You may nd that strace output looks \complex" | this is because it is trying to show you what is happening at the system call interface level, i.e. doesn’t try to hide what is going on. This of course also can make it more di cult to understand but a large part of the OS behavior of a process can be understood simply by looking at the trace. To simplify matters, we will ignore some portions of the strace output.




First, compile lab2-hello.c program to the executable lab2-hello. To simplify your initial system call tracing experiment, we will make a statically linked executable which does not need dynamic linking (eg. DLLs, in Windows these are les with the extension dll, while in Linux these have lename su x so)). (Static linking means that the libraries are incorporated into the executable itself while dynamic linking will link at runtime the executable with the dynamic libraries used).







$ gcc -static -o lab2-hello lab2-hello.c







The use of -static tells gcc to use static rather than dynamic linking to create the executable. For this lab, static linking will reduce the amount of output since dynamic linking will introduce extra system calls (we may discuss dynamic linking when we deal with the memory section of the course).















You should rst understand what lab2-hello.c is doing. It uses scanf() to read input into a string, printf() for formatted output, and getpid() to nd the process identi er (pid).




We can now trace all the system calls made by lab2-hello as follows:







$ strace ./lab2-hello







The output from strace is quite verbose. It consists of the strace output (a trace of the system calls) and any output from the process being straced. Both kinds of output are mingled together. To make it easier to understand and analyze, it is useful to save the output from strace into some les. strace sends the output of the program into the stream which is called standard output (stdout for the C stdio library) and the output from trace goes to standard error (stderr also de ned by stdio). Standard error is where error messages are normally sent to in Unix, and strace sends its own output to stderr. When you run in the shell (terminal) then the output from the program running and the strace output is mixed together, sometimes, this can seem a bit confusing.




Using the bash command shell, you can save the output from strace as follows:







$ strace ./lab2-hello 2strace.txt







Check the le strace.txt to see what it contains, e.g. less strace.txt. The syntax with () sends the output of strace which goes to le descriptor 2 into the le strace.txt. This is called I/O redirection. Later, when we cover les in the last part of the course, we will examine how I/O redirection works.1




You can also save the process output into another le. An example with both stdout and stderr streams going into separate les is: (there are 2 I/O redirections below)







$ strace ./lab2-hello 2strace-output.txt lab2-hello-output.txt







You should also read the man page for strace before and after Exercise 1. While it is not necessary to understand all the options, it is useful to understand what strace is doing and we will need some of those options for later.




HINTs:




All system calls are documented in the Linux manual, e.g. man 2 read. The rst execve() is from running the executable itself. If you get confused by which system call is coming from where, you can modify the C program just for your own testing but please submit your answer using the original code.







1.1 Question 1(a)




For lines labelled as LINE 4-LINE 8 in the C program, correlate it with the system calls from strace by explaining which system calls you think come from which line of the program. You don’t need to explain what they do, which is Question 1(b). To simplify the lab, you can ignore the following system calls: brk, readlink, access, fstat, lseek.







Of course, strace can itself be used to investigate I/O redirection.





















2



1.2 Question 1(b)




Try to explain for LINE 4-8 why you think those system calls occurred in the trace. Just make your best attempt (reading the man pages may help). You do not need to know precisely what is happening but as this is a very simple program, you should be able to have a good guess what it’s doing.







1.3 Question 1(c)




Instead of compiling your executable to be linked statically, now compile it with dynamic linking (which is the default with gcc).







$ gcc -o lab2-hello lab2-hello.c







Brie y describe the di erence in the trace with part 1(a). Explain whether a dynamic library is being used and what is the pathname. You do not need to understand what is going on with the dynamically linked executable but just that it changes the behavior of the program.




In the remainder of Question 1, you can use the static linked version.







1.4 Question 1(d)




What happens when LINE 9 is replaced by LINE 10 (just comment LINE 9 and uncomment LINE 10). You can see that LINE 6, exit() rather than exit(). Read the man page to see what the system call in the trace does. (Some remarks on threads: as we do not go into the details of threads, you can think of threads as something like a sub-process within a process. To be more precise, a thread is like another process which shares memory (rather than a copy as in fork()) and OS context with the parent).







Try the following three variations using strace to see what system call is used to terminate the process:







the original: using \exit(0)" (LINE 9 with LINE 10 commented out) use \ exit(0)" (LINE 10 with LINE 9 commented out)




comment out all the exit statements, i.e. fall through the end of main()










Explain what do you think is happening with the system call usage to \exit from the process" in each of the three variations. You should read the man pages for exit(3) and exit(2) (i.e. man 3 exit and man 2 exit).










1.5 Question 1(e)




Replace LINE 2 by LINE 3 by recommenting the code. What is the di erence in the trace? Explain what you think causes the di erence.

























3



1.6 Remarks




This exercise shows you that what happens in the actual system can sometimes be a bit di erent/more complex than you might realize. The documentation may sometimes be hard to interpret (in some cases, documentation may be wrong or out of date) and may not be presenting precisely what is happening. Occasionally, debugging tools may also have problems. (strace cannot properly trace certain programs|I leave students to think why this might be a an important feature [hint: think \security"]).2 You may also realize that strace is a user program running in user mode. Thus there isn’t any strace code in the OS kernel




When in doubt, read the source | is perhaps one way of nding out, but this may be di cult for the Linux code. For this question, you are supposed to extrapolate from the experiment, so reading the source code of the C library is not needed! Finally, a thought for the curious student to ponder upon | how does strace itself work since strace is a normal program in user mode.3







Exercise 2: Using strace for debugging (Graded)






Goals: Learn how system call tracing can be used to understand or debug a program.




Extract lab2-myst from lab2-myst.zip, e.g. unzip lab2-myst.zip. The le lab2-myst is a x86




Linux executable. In order to be able to run lab2-myst, you may need set the le mode to be executable:







$ chmod u+x lab2-myst







Try running lab2-myst a few times (make sure you have set the le mode). You may notice a feature that lab2-myst is a bit unusual in that it behaves non-deterministically. A deterministic program behaves the same way every time it is run while a non-deterministic program is possibly di erent every time it is run. You may not be familiar with non-deterministic programs since most programs are deterministic.




To set the context of this question:







Think of yourself as being an investigator. In real life, you could be doing something similar to debug a program or determine why the system is not working. For example, a program suddenly stops working. Reinstalling the program also happens not to work. Why? How to debug the problem? You may not have the source code or understand the code.







Your task is to use strace to understand an approximation of what the program does given that the source code is not given. Answer the following questions:




Question 2(a): Explain why the output is non-deterministic.




Question 2(b): Describe as best as you can what you think lab2-myst is doing? It might be the case that you are unable to explain all aspects of lab2-myst but try to explain as much as possible.




Question 2(c): You will see \42" in the output, explain how it arises.







The curious student might want to think of whether the act of being observed has a di erence on the observee, i.e. it makes a di erence in Quantum Mechanics.
3Its too complex to explain here but students who want to know more can see me. Can you strace strace?













4



HINT:




In Linux, the fork system call may be actually implemented using the clone system call. Reading the strace man page will help.







Submission






Your submission for a lab must be individual work. A joint or collaborative submission is not allowed for labs.




Submit using the le naming convention in Lab 1, a single PDF (or TXT) le with your answers to Exercise 1 and 2. Your student information should also be at the start of your le. Submit your le to the appropriate workbin. Note no code needs to be submitted for Lab 2.


























































































































































5