MURCHISON TECHNOLOGIES, INC Evaluating an Attorney’s Response and Identifying the..

MURCHISON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.: Evaluating an Attorney’s Response and Identifying the Proper Audit Report Read the case materials on pages 385 through 391 of your casebook. Answer questions 1 through 7 on page 387 of the case book (see some minor changes to the questions below). Additional information and/or the point values for each of the questions follows. Note that some requirements are changed a little bit below: 1. Worth 4 points 2. Worth 2 points 3. Not required 4. A. worth 1 point B. Instead of drafting a report, discuss what type of audit report you would issue and how it would differ from a standard unqualified report: Worth 3 points C. Not required D. Instead of drafting a report, discuss what type of audit report you would issue and how it would differ from a standard unqualified report: Worth 3 points E. worth 1 point F. Not required 5. Worth 3 points 6. Worth 2 points 7. Worth 3 points Writing and grammar are worth 3 points. WRITING REQUIREMENTS/RESTRICTIONS Prepare a Word document with the answers to the questions above, making sure to meet the following requirements/restrictions. ? 12-point font? One inch margins ? Double-spaced? Three page maximum
also please include answer of those 3 questions related to the case:



This week's discussion will be based on the cases that are due this week. All students must start their own thread prior to reading the responses of other students. Please answer the following completely and concisely:

Question 1: Satyam Computer: What is your overall feeling about the quality of the auditors' work on the Satyam Computer audit? Include specifics from the case to support your assessment.

Question 2: Satyam Computer: What is your overall feeling on the final discipline the audit firm was subject to? Include specifics from the case to support your assessment.

Question 3: Murchison: Why do you believe the attorney's letter was received so close to the completion of the audit? Should the auditors have requested a response from the attorney closer to the December 31, 2011 year end? Why or why not?

 
Powered by